|
Vrzone.com Article: A first look at the Asus Xonar D2 Soundcard
Asus Xonar D2 Audio Card - A Strong Competitor in the Sound Arena? ![]() Xonar's Packaging
The Asus Xonar has made waves ever since we saw it at Asus' booth at CeBIT, and subequently, we have been following up on its development from external sources as well as some exclusive news that we've gotten from the our sources in Asus. Right now, we take a first look at the components onboard, and at the same time we will do a brief component comparison with the Creative X-Fi Elite Pro. First, we'll start off with some of the specifications of the Xonar D2..
Interesting specifications, 4x Burr Brown PCM1796 DAC... Let's take a look at more interesting stuff that will be unveiled in the following pages... A closer look at the Xonar D2
The card with the MIDI DIN breakout
The Xonar D2 with the EMI Shield
THe card strip naked... What happens when the Xonar is plugged in...
LEDs emits a cool red light from the EMI Shield when powered up!
LED Audio jacks adds additional bling, and allow users to recognise the different jacks under low light conditions. Asus Xonar Software Preview
Xonar D2 Audio Center
Windows MCE software kit and 10-ft GUI For the Xonar D2
Asus Portable Music Processor Utility which allows you to add additional Dolby effects to new additions in your music library.
Ableton Live 6 Lite, a music production software bundled with the Xonar. Comparison of Asus Xonar D2 and Creative X-Fi Elite Pro
Asus Xonar vs Creative Elite Pro: OpAmp: LM4562(Xonar) Vs JRC2114(X-Fi) The LM4562 on the Xonar has improved noise rejection capabilities from PC's switch mode power supply. Improved CMRR (Common Mode Rejection Ratio) on the LM4562 removes any additional noise generated at its inputs. The JRC2114 used on the X-Fi is used extensively in electronics due to its low cost of implementation and noise rejection capabilities are low, which also means that it might be an issue when used with power supplies without careful power regulation and noise filtering. Separate OpAmps used for balanced to unbalanced (and I/v) conversion and output used for Xonar which offers better performance, wheras the X-Fi uses a single dual-opamp for both differential and output circuit. Large possibility of reduced performance due to crosstalk. Digital-to-Analouge Converter: PCM1796(Xonar) Vs CS4398(X-Fi) The Burr Brown PCM1796 DAC has better SNR (Signal to Noise Ratio) when compared to the Cirrus Logic CS4398 found on the X-Fi. It has also been tested and proven in high-end Hi-fidelity electronics such as CD players. Although the CS4398 has good specifications but it would be more useful when applied in professional audio equipment. Capacitors selection Special attention was made on the use of capacitor type that specifically enhances the power and audio delivery paths on the Xonar, wheras the X-Fi is using one single type of capacitor for both applications. The usage of various Taiwanese capacitors like Luxon and Jamicon non-low ESR capacitors on the X-Fi will offer moderate performance for the opamps. No film capacitors are seen, which is a pity as they can help improve transients, details and general performance of opamps, particularly those of the JRC 2114’s generation. The usage of solid capacitors on the Xonar offers lower ESR which helps improve dynamics, details and extension for opamps. Solid caps also filter out high frequency noise better which helps as computer PSU’s generally output more high frequency noise & ripple. Component placement The Xonar offers well defined areas for its power and audio path. It offers ease of identification of areas of interest and allows noise generated by its powers regulators be easily controlled. Conclusion Specifications wise, the Xonar really does pack a very solid punch, and beats competition hands down in every area. For now, all we can do is to wait for the Xonar D2 launch in this coming quarter... Many thanks to Tensor (Ignatius) and DreamSlacker (Benji) for their inputs! | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||