VR-Zone : Technology Beats - Nvidia 8800 GTS 512MB Review - The Essence of 128 Shader Processors

Nvidia 8800 GTS 512MB Review - The Essence of 128 Shader Processors

Posted on Tue December 11 2007 9:42 am by VRArchiver

Filed under: Archives, Graphics Card, Reviews

Just over a month after NVIDIA stole the show with the introduction of their G92 based 8800GT, they have re-introduced the 8800GTS based on the G92 to up the ante with ATI once again. Today, we will take the 8800GTS offerings from Asus and Inno3D for a spin and see how much of a difference the 16 additional Unified Shader Processers make.
Read More ⇒

You have to register before you can post Comments. Register for a VR-Zone Forum Membership now!

Comment by: white_snake7 on 29-Dec-2007 11:16 am

I am looking for one of those GT and GTS. Can anyone help me for suggestion to go with which card? As i saw the prize list, Most of GTS brands prize are 100 sg bucks over GT. Thanks to all for all of your comments.

Comment by: Shrek on 23-Dec-2007 10:31 am

i wish they had 1gb ver

Comment by: tc17 on 23-Dec-2007 9:58 am

I wish someone would review these new cards with a "normal" cpu and resolutions instead of the insane high end stuff. Far more people have middle range computers than they do the high end.

It seems every review has some $1000 cpu in it.

Comment by: floppy on 17-Dec-2007 5:22 pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by labsmaster23

The G92 GTS and GT has a high potential cards, but the way nVidia design it to run at their speeds right now is solely for markeeting purpose only. Given the fact that a GT can clock up to match an Ultra when OC'd...

that's why the distinction between 128sp and 112sp

Comment by: labsmaster23 on 17-Dec-2007 5:20 pm

The G92 GTS and GT has a high potential cards, but the way nVidia design it to run at their speeds right now is solely for markeeting purpose only. Given the fact that a GT can clock up to match an Ultra when OC'd...

Comment by: Komano on 12-Dec-2007 5:24 pm

lol. got anything such as manual override then manual overclock?. XD

Comment by: Dreamslacker on 12-Dec-2007 12:29 am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Banok FTW

"On to the overclocking, we pretty much maxed out the options on Asus' overclocking utility raising the GPU to 700MHz"

I think you meant to say 750mhz. thats what you overclocked the core to in the picture. and 700mhz wouldn't be maxing it out when the asus top is at 740mhz. I doubt 750mhz would be maxing it out either

I don't think 750MHz is the maximum the core can take but that seems to be the maximum the utility allows.

Comment by: floppy on 12-Dec-2007 12:15 am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Banok FTW

"On to the overclocking, we pretty much maxed out the options on Asus' overclocking utility raising the GPU to 700MHz"

I think you meant to say 750mhz. thats what you overclocked the core to in the picture. and 700mhz wouldn't be maxing it out when the asus top is at 740mhz. I doubt 750mhz would be maxing it out either

aplogies. fixed. will do something funky to the card soon, please give us a moment.

Comment by: Banok FTW on 12-Dec-2007 12:06 am

"On to the overclocking, we pretty much maxed out the options on Asus' overclocking utility raising the GPU to 700MHz"

I think you meant to say 750mhz. thats what you overclocked the core to in the picture. and 700mhz wouldn't be maxing it out when the asus top is at 740mhz. I doubt 750mhz would be maxing it out either

Comment by: c1em3ntchua on 11-Dec-2007 10:40 pm

the 1st sentence was lol. it made me read on

Comment by: lennardseah on 11-Dec-2007 8:00 pm

wah 2000mhz on pixel

Post Comments

More >>

Nvidia 8800 GTS 512MB Review - The Essence of 128 Shader Processors

DSLR

Mobile Phones

Video and Photography

AOCC 2008

IT Show

Audio

Barebones

Cooling

Digital Audio

Display

Enterprise

Graphics Card

Input

Memory

Mobile Computing

Motherboard

Networking

Overclocking

Power Supplies

Processors

Storage

Linux

Windows

Archives

Editorials

Events

Guides

Interviews

News

Previews

Promotions

Reviews

Sim Lim